Thursday, September 29, 2016

Starting in Jan.2017 with POTUS Trump

Trump in FL, IA, WI:  “Here are just some of the things starting in Jan.2017:”
  o  I’m going to lower your taxes, massively;
  o  Repeal many regulations;
  o  Repeal and Replace Obamacare;
  o  Unleash American energy;
  o  End Illegal-Immigration;
  o  We’re going to build the WALL, Mexico pay 100%;
  o  We’ll have great relations with Mexico; They’ll still love us, they are amazing;
  o  Keep RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS out of our country;
  o  Save the Second Amendment;
  o  Support our great policemen;
  o  Nominate Constitutionalists to the Supreme Court;
  o  Rebuild our infrastructures: roads, bridges, tunnels;
  o  American workers will do the work;  Put steel back in the back of America.

We’ll be one nation working together saluting one flag …  

OANn,   One America News network, out of San Diego: www.OANN.com
          “Your source for credible news” … “Your nation—your news”
ED: While other networks were commenting on Trump, one network broadcast
the amazing rally/talk of Donald J. Trump--we thank them, sincerely .!. OANn


Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Future of Asia Conference 2016


Summary: Future of Asia Conference 2016
Thursday, September 15 - Friday, September 16


Opening Session: Asia 2030 "Panel of Ten"

Future of Asia Conference 2016

The Los Angeles World Affairs Council's inaugural “Future of Asia” conference on Sept 15th-16th revealed a continent where economic pragmatism increasingly trumps political animosity, where Asian millennials are focused on the promise of future growth rather than historical grievance, where private entrepreneurs are making inroads into the state-dominated economy in China, where an inward-looking India is starting to engage with the outside world, where a formerly flailing Japan has found some stable political leadership... but where air quality and food safety are suspect, and inter-state rivalries require, more than ever, a stabilizing US presence.  Asia is a continent where the stakes are rising rapidly - both in economic promise and expansion of individuals' horizons, but also in environmental and security challenges.

57 speakers and 414 attendees engaged in broad-ranging conversations at the Fairmont Hotel in Santa Monica about the future of the Asia-Pacific and its relations with the US, under the overarching theme of "Asia's Emerging Middle Class" - predicted by the OECD to grow from 500 million in 2009 to 3 billion by 2030.  Building on the success of this year's conference, next year the Los Angeles World Affairs Council's "Future of Asia 2017" conference will focus on "Leadership in Asia", both in the political arena and in the business world. Videos of all the talks and panel discussions from "Future of Asia 2016" will be posted online in the coming weeks. 

The conference opened with 10 speakers talking for three minutes on their vision of Asia in 2030.  Shivshankar Menon, former Indian National Security Adviser, said that by 2030 "Asia will surpass the combined economic and military might of North America and Europe - this is not that the US is declining, but that China and India are rising."  Liu Ming from the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences said that while China today is a significant regional power, by 2030 it will be a global power, "more open and self-confident."  Tatsuo Yamasaki from Mitsubishi Corporation warned of an intense competition for natural resources in the future in Asia, and Bloomberg View's Mihir Sharma cautioned that the 500 million Indians under 25 will grow up to be angry and aggressive if India does not become as economically prosperous as they have been given to dream.  But the upside for the growing middle class is already showing itself in the travel market - cruise ship passenger numbers are up by 39% in Asia, compared to 4% growth in the rest of the world, according to Jan Swartz of Princess Cruises.  Martin Drew of Etihad said that in India, currently only 3% of the population travels overseas - a "mere" 40 million people, while in China just 4% of the population has passports - and Chinese tourists still spend more money around the world than any other nation.  Wait until they reach American levels of 35%, or European levels where 70% of the population has a passport! 

Much of Asia's growth will occur in the cities - 82% of Americans live in cities, but still just 48% of Asians are urbanized, a figure that is changing rapidly - "One Canada is being built every year in Asia" said Benjy Ward from the architectural firm Gensler.  But the breakneck pace of China's urbanization has created daunting concrete megablocks, often with inadequate basic services, including clean, running water.  "The number one threat to humanity is water scarcity, and China is facing that, from leaks and pollution," said Neal Gordon from JM Eagle, the world's largest plastic pipe manufacturer.  "Our dream is for Chinese to turn on their tap and have clean, healthy water."

Andy Xie, former top China economist for Morgan Stanley, reminded the audience that China is a "reemerging economy", not an "emerging" economy, since it was quite prosperous in the 1920's and '30's.  Today he said that despite rapid growth it is being held back by the high level of state investment, compared to private investment: "the nominal GDP is up by 22 times, but nobody has made money off the stock market - that is totally nuts!"  As an example of the state's overinvestment, he points out that China builds 10,000 kms of new highway every year.  The highway system is already larger than the US - and yet China's automobile fleet is only half of the US.  "All China's problems can be traced to this misallocation of capital." 



Dinner Keynote: Admiral Harry Harris

Notwithstanding the drag effects of China's state owned enterprises and India's unyielding bureaucratic red tape, both economies are set to become powerhouses with enormous buying power.  "China and India will account for half the Asian middle class by 2030 and one-third of the global middle class," said Alan Siqueira of Wells Fargo.  "The numbers are staggering and will generate significant growth opportunities for multinational companies."

The interdependence of Asia and the US came up repeatedly during the conference, both in terms of the business and investment opportunities spanning the Pacific, and also in the desire of most Asian countries for the US to continue to guarantee the peace in the region, even as they increase their economic ties to China.  Bilahari Kausikan, ambassador-at-large from Singapore, said that South East Asian countries "want to have the best possible relationship with both the US and China, and do not want to have to choose between them - the US will play a vital role in maintaining this balance."  Kausikan said that the disputes between the US and China may not be able to be solved, "but they can be managed."  Jeff Bader, who was President Obama's top Asia advisor on the National Security Council, said that there has been considerable progress between the US and China on climate change and other areas, but said one dark spot was the need for more cooperation on North Korea: "if North Korea continues on this path, we will need to take action against them that China will not like."

Duncan Clark, who has just written a book about Alibaba's Jack Ma, recounted the riveting rise of Ma from tour guide to one of the wealthiest entrepreneurs on the planet through his extraordinary ability to "lead and inspire - he is a fantastic talker."  Clark said "If you really want to annoy anyone in Alibaba tell them they are the Amazon of China - they will punch you - because they are really more than that."  With the world's biggest IPO of $25 bn in 2014, Alibaba is responsible for 30 million packages being delivered daily and processes one third of all global online payments.  Now the Communist Party has to work out how to deal with such a powerful figure in private enterprise: "The PRC is the 'pragmatic republic of China'," said Clark.  "They know they have to adapt - we are talking about a negotiated transfer of power from the government to the private sector."  Albert Wong of Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks said "in the next 10 to 20 years, startup entrepreneurs will take over China and Hong Kong."  And while China's legal system is still far behind the US, Christopher Tang from UCLA Anderson School of Management said Americans need to get used to the lack of legal clarity: "that is the way it is - the opportunity is that you can try new things!"  Andrew Pan of East West Bank said the US needs to continually encourage China to be an international player.  China has "opened the door" to foreign banking, but kept it at a very low percent.  And former US Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky said that 70% of US companies complain that China's regulations are the single biggest barrier to investment in the country.  But at the same time Chinese companies realize they need to engage in the west.  In a panel on the future of cars moderated by Michael Dunne of Dunne Automotive, Patrick Duan of BYD from Shenzhen said that the reason his company chose to begin making electric cars in California and not back in China was because "the US is a quality market, it is good for brand image.  If we made the cars in China and tried to sell here it would not be successful."

Meanwhile as India's growth rate has overtaken China for the past year, Bloomberg's Mihir Sharma sought to deflate the India-China league ranking: "the comparison has always been misleading because China has always had a more effective state - these were not comparable countries for the past 1,000 years." But clearly there has been progress of late, with India's economy predicted to grow by 7.9% this year.  Gunjan Bagla of Amritt said that under Prime Minister Modi "corruption in the higher levels of India has been pretty much eliminated."  Rafiq Dossani from RAND Corporation reminded everyone that in India, "conditions for the poor are miserable," but said that at the very least in democratic India "there are important election cycles every year putting pressure on the government to perform."  But Sharma, who said "I love India - it is so complicated!" warned that India still lags in education and social services: "an uneducated and unhealthy workforce cannot build strength in a 21st century economy."

On the Entertaining Asia panel, Angela Killoren of CJ Entertainment pointed out how the Korean dance bands of K-pop transcended borders to appeal to many different cultures in Asia and beyond, driven by social media: "Youtube is the primary music discovery platform across the globe."  What is more, the high production quality of K-pop videos that have spread around Asia has raised the bar for what audiences in China and elsewhere expect in terms of production quality from their domestically-produced TV and music products - nobody wants to watch shoddily-produced shows any more.  Man Jit Singh from Sony Pictures said that there was a similar spreading of Bollywood dance movies which are starting to become popular in China and Korea - "For Indian entertainment the spread out has been bigger than the spread in."  Outside the music world, with films and TV dramas audiences are most interested in local content. "People want stories told in their local language with their local stars they know and love," said Killoren.  On Thursday night Jonathan Friedland of Netflix said that to appeal to local markets in Asia - an area that Netflix has only been operating in for less than a year - they were already making multiple shows in Japanese and also producing shows in Hindi, Korean and even in the Cambodian language.  "Incomes are rising enormously across Asia and there are lots of adaptations for mobile businesses," said Friedland.  "All of this benefits the consumption of entertainment."

Despite the overall optimism amongst most of the speakers on Asia's future prospects, there were some challenges, and none more urgent than the nuclear threat from North Korea, as elaborated by Admiral Harry Harris, the Hawaii-based PACOM commander in his keynote speech on Thursday evening.  Noting that North Korea is "the only nation to have tested nuclear weapons this century," Harris, who commands 380,000 US personnel across the Asia-Pacific, said "I want you to stop for a minute and think about this - combining nuclear warheads with ballistic missiles in the hands of a volatile leader like Kim Jong-Un is a recipe for disaster."  He called on China to do more to pressure Pyongyang, and said he also prioritized US-South Korean-Japan cooperation against North Korea.

Hyeonseo Lee, a defector from North Korea, told the "Pyongyang-Seoul" panel moderated by Kathy Moon from Brookings how "we woke up some days with whole families disappearing overnight."  The government's line was that the disappearances were "the Americans' fault".  But today as more and more Chinese cell phones are being smuggled into North Korea the regime's propaganda is less airtight.  Yoon Young-kwan, former S Korean foreign minister, said the more contact there is between the two parts of Korea, the more likely it is there will be an internal transformation of the Pyongyang regime, as opposed to a sudden - and potentially dangerous - collapse. 

Chung Min Lee from Yonsei University in Seoul called Asia "the department store of security dilemmas", and said "the big debate in Tokyo and Seoul for the next few years is between social security versus national security."  As rising prosperity has allowed states to pour money into military resources, Bud Cole from the National War College ticked off a long list of countries in Asia who have begun building a submarine fleet in response to China's submarine program - "China's actions are almost counterproductive," he said.  But despite a widely-shared concern over North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missile program, there was notably less anxiety amongst conference participants over the South China Sea that has grabbed the headlines of late.  "There is a low probability of conflict breaking out over the South China Sea," said Admiral Dennis Blair, former PACOM commander and Director of National Intelligence.  He pointed to a long string of disputes over small island groups from northern Asia between Russia and Japan all the way down to the equator.  Adm Blair said the region was used to managing these territorial squabbles, and "all the maneuvering over the South China Sea islands is also bumping and grinding its way through to a balance."  Eiichi Katahara from the National Institute of Defense Studies in Tokyo expressed paradoxical concerns about China: "Yes, we are concerned about China's growing [military] capacity, but we are also concerned about China collapsing.  We need China to be stable!"


Pyongyang-Seoul Panel: Katharine Moon, Yoon Young-kwan, Hyeonseo Lee, Chung Min Lee

In the Asian Healthcare panel UCLA Center for World Health's Tom Coates observed that care in Asia is over-centralized in hospitals, and needs to spread out more.  And environmentalist Wen Bo pointed out the toll of increased cancer and other diseases from widespread pollution in China: "think of China as a boxer - he can be very tough and very big - but if he has cancer, he will die."

On the Change in Japan panel, Barrenrock's Clay Chandler pointed out that Japan is losing a million people a year in net population shrinkage, and yet there is little support for increasing immigration into the country.  In an earlier session on Friday Tokyo University Professor of Gerontology Hiroko Akiyama had talked about her pilot programs designing communities for Japan's aging society, including giving seniors"workplaces for a second life" with part time jobs growing vegetables on roof-top gardens or providing childcare support.  But she too saw little change in the near term on the country's immigration policy.

At least the current government of Shinzo Abe is relatively stable, said Tsuneo Watanabe of the Tokyo Foundation - largely thanks to the previous "bad" administrations that nobody wants to return to.  Richard McGregor of the Financial Times pointed out the paradoxical relationship between Japan and its large neighbor China, on whom they rely economically but whom they view with suspicion politically:"Japan is not sure if they want China to succeed or fail."

But when asked about the future of Japan-Chinese relations, both Liu Ming from the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences and former vice finance minister in Japan Tatsuo Yamasaki said that despite the political differences between the two countries, they would have to learn to live together.  "I think our countries are both very smart," said Liu Ming.  "We will have half competition and half cooperation."  And Yamasaki said, despite the areas where they disagree, both countries' economies are closely linked.  "We cannot live without each other."   Speaking after breakfast on Friday, Richard Wike of the Pew Research Center said that despite the political friction between Tokyo and Beijing, a plurality of Japanese polled (47%) said that China's economic growth "is a good thing" for Japan.

Talking about the "China Dream" as enunciated by President Xi Jinping, Huang Jing of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy said that, unlike the "American Dream" which in centered on individuals' hopes and achievements, the "China Dream" is a collective, national aspiration, coming from the top down.   Or as Claremont's Minxing Pei put it, "What Xi Jinping dreams of is the survival of a one-party system."  Meanwhile as for the Chinese middle class and the desire for democracy, Huang said that clearly Chinese citizens want more control over their lives, but "they want evolution, not revolution".

Jeff Wasserstrom of UC Irvine and Chu Dongmei of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences discussed China's "One Belt One Road" strategy of expanding investment and development across Central Asia.  Many countries in the region are keen to have Chinese involvement to balance against Russia's power.  But Wasserstrom cautioned that by trying to build railroads in violence-prone countries like Pakistan, China might be overstepping - "China is venturing into dangerous territory there."

The Future of Asia is, of course, uncertain territory - full of opportunity, but pricked with risk and unknowable unknowns. Who could have imagined a penniless tour guide from a small Chinese city rising to become the world's largest online seller in the space of 15 years?  As Asian countries continue to grow in economic and political might, one of the defining questions for their future, and for the future of the world, will be the quality of leadership in Asia - in government, in board rooms, and in society at large.  We hope you will join us for "Future of Asia 2017" - "Looking at Leadership." 

Sincerely,   Terry McCarthy
President and CEO, Los Angeles Foreign Affairs Council



Sunday, September 25, 2016

Glenn Beck is being misunderstood

Glenn Beck is being misunderstood, still and again.

It is not what you think!  Pundits are getting his motivation all wrong.  You need to understand God, Mormon theology, Armageddon, Good-and-Evil, and personal revelation to understand why Beck opposed Trump.   

We’ll explain all of this as God’s October Surprise, to have Beck say he is voting for Trump the week before Nov.8th.  

Like Ted Cruz, Beck will say he votes for Trump to prevent losing America to Clinton Cash.

Bottom Line, for now:  God is in control.  Beck is all about doing God’s will—Beck may be on the wrong side, but that is where God wants him.


Your discussion/comments are requested. See our insights herein.


Saturday, September 24, 2016

As promised, Ted Cruz backs the Nominee .!.

Cruz supports Trump with his vote

To keep his promise to support the Republican Nominee, Cruz says he will vote for TrumpHe lists all the reasons to vote against Mrs H.Clinton and for Donald Trump.  He encourages everyone to vote for Trump also.  Donald J. Trump graciously praises his decision and calls him a great man.  Beck says he is disappointed—Cruz will speak to purists on Glenn Beck’s radio show Monday.

“I’ve made this decision for two reasons. First, last year, I promised to support the Republican nominee. And I intend to keep my word.
Second, even though I have had areas of significant disagreement with our nominee, by any measure Hillary Clinton is wholly unacceptable — that’s why I have always been #NeverHillary.

“Six key policy differences inform my decision.  First, and most important, the Supreme Court. For anyone concerned about the Bill of Rights — free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment — the Court hangs in the balance. I have spent my professional career fighting before the Court to defend the Constitution. We are only one justice away from losing our most basic rights, and the next president will appoint as many as four new justices. We know, without a doubt, that every Clinton appointee would be a left-wing ideologue. Trump, in contrast, has promised to appoint justices “in the mold of Scalia.”

For some time, I have been seeking greater specificity on this issue, and today the Trump campaign provided that, releasing a very strong list of potential Supreme Court nominees — including Sen. Mike Lee, who would make an extraordinary justice — and making an explicit commitment to nominate only from that list. This commitment matters, and it provides a serious reason for voters to choose to support Trump.

Second, Obamacare. The failed healthcare law is hurting millions of Americans. If Republicans hold Congress, leadership has committed to passing legislation repealing Obamacare. Clinton, we know beyond a shadow of doubt, would veto that legislation. Trump has said he would sign it.

Third, energy. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s war on coal and relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry. Trump has said he will reduce regulations and allow the blossoming American energy renaissance to create millions of new high-paying jobs.

Fourth, immigration. Clinton would continue and even expand President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty. Trump has promised that he would revoke those illegal executive orders.

Fifth, national security. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism. She would continue importing Middle Eastern refugees whom the FBI cannot vet to make sure they are not terrorists. Trump has promised to stop the deluge of unvetted refugees.

Sixth, Internet freedom. Clinton supports Obama’s plan to hand over control of the Internet to an international community of stakeholders, including Russia, China, and Iran. Just this week, Trump came out strongly against that plan, and in support of free speech online.
These are six vital issues where the candidates’ positions present a clear choice for the American people.

If Clinton wins, we know — with 100% certainty — that she would deliver on her left-wing promises, with devastating results for our country.
My conscience tells me I must do whatever I can to stop that.
We also have seen, over the past few weeks and months, a Trump campaign focusing more and more on freedom — including emphasizing school choice and the power of economic growth to lift African-Americans and Hispanics to prosperity.

Finally, after eight years of a lawless Obama administration, targeting and persecuting those disfavored by the administration, fidelity to the rule of law has never been more important.

The Supreme Court will be critical in preserving the rule of law. And, if the next administration fails to honor the Constitution and Bill of Rights, then I hope that Republicans and Democrats will stand united in protecting our fundamental liberties.

Our country is in crisis. Hillary Clinton is manifestly unfit to be president, and her policies would harm millions of Americans. And Donald Trump is the only thing standing in her way.

A year ago, I pledged to endorse the Republican nominee, and I am honoring that commitment. And if you don’t want to see a Hillary Clinton presidency, I encourage you to vote for him.


What if Trump is asked about Snowden?

What should Trump answer?  ("Is Edward Snowden a whistleblower and patriot, or is he a traitor?")  And should he be pardoned?

What is the best possible response from Donald Trump if asked if the president (Obama) should give Snowden a pardon?  Edward Snowden wants to return to America with his wife, only if pardoned. The ACLU and others encourage a presidential pardon for Edward Joseph Snowden.


The best response is to say, “That is for the next occupant of the White House to decide.” And leave it there for Mrs H.Clinton to talk on-and-on. Her ratings go down when she talks.  If pressed, Trump should say he has “no comment.” On the other hand, he could have a secret/confidential commonsense answer.

You should watch the “Snowden” official trailer:  
It’s a love story.   www.newSnowdenFilm.com

Official website for the movie:  www.SnowdenFilm.com


[major news release]
- SEPTEMBER 23, 2016 -

​“DONALD J. TRUMP FINALIZES LIST OF POTENTIAL SUPREME COURT JUSTICE PICKS”


[ED: conservatives suggested by the Heritage foundation and Federalist society!]


NEW YORK, NY - Today Donald J. Trump released a second list of individuals he would consider as potential replacements for Justice Scalia at the United States Supreme Court. This group builds upon the highly praised list of choices he named in May 2016. These individuals were selected, first and foremost, based on constitutional principles, with input from respected conservative leaders.

Mr. Trump stated, “We have a very clear choice in this election. The freedoms we cherish and the constitutional values and principles our country was founded on are in jeopardy. The responsibility is greater than ever to protect and uphold these freedoms and I will appoint justices, who like Justice Scalia, will protect our liberty with the highest regard for the Constitution. This list is definitive and I will choose only from it in picking future Justices of the United States Supreme Court. I would like to thank the Federalist Society, The Heritage Foundation and the many other individuals who helped in composing this list of twenty-one highly respected people who are the kind of scholars that we need to preserve the very core of our country, and make it greater than ever before.” 

Keith Blackwell is a justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia. He was appointed to the position in 2012. He had previously served on the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Before serving on the bench, Justice Blackwell was a Deputy Special Attorney General of the State of Georgia, an Assistant District Attorney in Cobb County, and a commercial litigator in private practice. Justice Blackwell is a graduate of the University of Georgia School of Law.

Charles Canady is a justice of the Supreme Court of Florida. He has served in that role since 2008, and he served as the court's chief justice from 2010 to 2012. Prior to his appointment, Justice Canady served as a judge of the Florida Second District Court of Appeal and as a member of the United States House of Representatives for four terms. Justice Canady is a graduate of Yale Law School.

Neil Gorsuch is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. He was appointed to the position in 2006. Judge Gorsuch previously served in the Justice Department as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. Judge Gorsuch was a Marshall Scholar and received his law degree from Harvard. He clerked for Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy.

Mike Lee is the Junior U.S. Senator from Utah and currently serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee. He has previously served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Utah and as a Supreme Court Clerk for Justice Alito.

Edward Mansfield is a justice of the Iowa Supreme Court. He was appointed to the court in 2011 and retained by voters in 2012. Justice Mansfield previously served as a judge of the Iowa Court of Appeals. He also teaches law at Drake University as an adjunct professor. Justice Mansfield is a graduate of Yale Law School.

Federico Moreno is a judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States. He previously served as a state and county court judge in Florida. Judge Moreno is a graduate of the University of Miami School of Law.

Margaret A. Ryan has been a judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces since 2006. Judge Ryan served in the Marine Corps through deployments in the Philippines and the Gulf War. She then attended Notre Dame Law School through a military scholarship and served as a JAG officer for four years. Judge Ryan clerked for Judge J. Michael Luttig of the Fourth Circuit and Justice Clarence Thomas.

Amul Thapar is a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, serving since his appointment in 2007, when he became the first South Asian Article III judge. He has taught law students at the University of Cincinnati and Georgetown. Judge Thapar has served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C. and the Southern District of Ohio. Immediately prior to his judicial appointment, Judge Thapar was the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Judge Thapar received his law degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Timothy Tymkovich is the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Judge Tymkovich was appointed to the bench in 2003. He previously served as Colorado Solicitor General. Judge Tymkovich is a graduate of the University of Colorado College of Law.
Robert Young is the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Michigan. He was appointed to the court in 1999, and became part of a majority of justices who embraced originalism and led what one scholar described as a "textualism revolution." Justice Young previously served as a judge on the Michigan Court of Appeals. Chief Justice Young is a graduate of Harvard Law School.

Full list of the twenty-one Mr. Trump will [select from]:

1. Keith Blackwell
2. Charles Canady
3. Steven Colloton
4. Allison Eid
5. Neil Gorsuch
6. Raymond Gruender
7. Thomas Hardiman
8. Raymond Kethledge
9. Joan Larsen
10. Mike Lee
11. Thomas Lee
12. Edward Mansfield
13. Federico Moreno
14. William Pryor
15. Margaret A. Ryan
16. Amul Thapar
17. Timothy Tymkovich
18. David Stras
19. Diane Sykes
20. Don Willett
21. Robert Young









HRC vs Trump INFO for the voters/supporters

Would you care to add to this list?

Trump: We're Going to Build a Wall!
Clinton: Open Borders!
Trump: Deport Illegals!
Clinton: Amnesty Now!
Trump: Get Our Jobs Back!
Clinton: Protect NAFTA!
Trump: Stop Illegal Immigration!
Clinton: 500% More Radical Islamists!
Trump: Reduce the Citizens Tax Burden!
Clinton: Raise Taxes Across the Board!
Trump: Decent Health Care!
Clinton: Obamacare Forever!
Trump: Take Care of Our Veterans!
Clinton: Bonuses for Corrupt VA Bureaucrats!
Trump: Uphold the 2nd Amendment!
Clinton: Regulate the 2nd Amendment!, and Disarm All Law-Abiding Citizens!!

Trump:  Supreme Court from a list of 21 Constitutionalists !!!
Clinton: More activist- puppets like the “wise Latino” and Souter.

Trump: Control Our Trade Agreements!
Clinton: Pass TPP Now!
Trump: Prosecute and Jail Hillary Clinton!
Clinton: Noooooooooooooooo!
Trump: Make America Great Again!
Clinton: Make ME great again!

Your comments and discussion are welcome and encouraged.

What Topics Should Be Covered at the First Presidential Debate

“What Topics Should Be Covered at the Presidential Debate[s]?”   o—o   WSJ
ED:  This is interactive to receive your requested question.
Published Sept. 23, 2016 at 12:00 p.m. ET
You've selected 1 out of 5 issues important to you.
The Wall Street Journal will be tracking what's discussed—and not discussed—at the first presidential debate on Sept. 26 between Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump.
The broad subjects discussed at the first debate, hosted by NBC, will be America's Direction, Achieving Prosperity and Securing America.
Select up to five topics you're most interested in seeing the candidates discuss and tell us why they're so important to you.

ECONOMY
Estate tax
Corporate tax
Income tax
Capital gains tax
Property Taxes
Online Sales Tax
Welfare
Unions
Entitlements
Budget deficit
National debt
Infrastructure
Inflation
Interest rates
FED
Growth
Productivity
Poverty Rate
Unemployment rate
Overtime pay
Minimum wage
Pensions
Wages
Income inequality
Equal pay
Paid leave
Bitcoin

DOMESTIC POLICY
Social Security
Obamacare
Medicare
Insurance premiums
Single-payer health care
Police violence
Charlotte, N.C.
Tulsa, Okla.
Health care
Supreme Court
Gun control
Crime
Police body cameras
Death penalty
Veterans
Vaccinations
Child care
Drug prices
Marijuana
Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
Patriot Act
Eminent Domain
Affirmative Action
Dakota Access Pipeline

FOREIGN POLICY
Russia
Vladimir Putin
China
Europe
Africa
Iraq
Iran
Egypt
Syria
Ukraine
ISIS
Israel
Cuba
North Korea
Mexico
Puerto Rico
Brexit
Muslims
NATO
Nuclear tests
Drones
Airstrikes
Terrorism
“Islamic Terrorism”
Venezuela
Military funding
Immigration
Women in combat

WALL STREET
Dodd-Frank
Bank Break-ups
Bank Bail-outs
Wall Street ties
Hedge Funds Tax
FED
Wall Street accountability

EDUCATION
College affordability
Student loans
K-12 education
Common Core
Charter schools

TRADE
Trans-Pacific Partnership
NAFTA
WTO
Tariffs

SOCIAL ISSUES
Gay marriage
Gender
Transgender issues
“Black Lives Matter”
Abortion
Planned Parenthood
Religious freedom

ELECTORAL ISSUES
Voter Fraud
Campaign Finance
Transparency
Third-party candidates

NATIONAL SECURITY
NSA
Snowden
Sexual assault
Sequestration
For-profit prisons
War on drugs

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Climate change
GMO
Alternative energy
Fracking
Oil drilling

CAMPAIGN CONTROVERSIES
Emails
Benghazi
Trump University
Pam Bondi
Medical history
Tax records
Border wall
Clinton Foundation
Trump’s charity
Racism
David Duke
Breitbart
The alt-right
Deplorables
Pneumonia

IMMIGRATION
Border wall
Amnesty
Path to citizenship
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
“Dreamers”

PEOPLE
Barack Obama
Paul Ryan
Bernie Sanders
Bill Clinton
Tim Kaine
Mike Pence
Chelsea Clinton
Trump’s children


ED: Our top two QUESTIONS:  Will you strictly follow the letter and the spirit of the Constitution; and who will you appoint to the Supreme Court?